Yesterday's Senate passage of its version of the big economic stimulus bill sets the stage for final negotiations between the House and Senate to come up with a final bill. As is often the case with major packages of legislation, there's a risk of eleventh-hour additions for which the policy implications have not been clearly thought out.
Case in point: content filtering by ISPs. The Senate's provisions to stimulate broadband deployment say that recipients of federal assistance should comply with interconnection and nondiscrimination requirements. Senator Feinstein has been pushing hard to add language specifying that ISPs may engage in "reasonable network management" -- and here's the kicker -- "such as" efforts to combat illegal activity like "child pornography and copyright infringement."
This would wade squarely into the highly controversial area of whether ISPs should really be in the business of actively inspecting the contents of Internet traffic to try to detect and block unlawful material. CDT has major concerns about ISPs assuming the role of Internet police. Doing so would require broad use of deep packet inspection, with all the privacy issues that can raise. And identifying copyright infringement is not easy, because an ISP has no easy way to tell whether particular uses of copyrighted material are licensed or constitute "fair use."
The bottom line is, the stimulus bill being rushed though Congress is not the right place to have Congress put its thumb on the scales of this ongoing policy debate. Plus, I think it would be a real mistake to suggest that the term "network management" includes content-based filtering of Internet traffic.
Read more »