Back to www.cdt.org                    
  IMAGE MAP
Join CDT's Action Network!

Join With CDT in Making an Impact on Internet Policy!



Wiretap Overview

Overview Government Surveillance of Telephones and the Internet


Search & Seizure
The Dept. of Justice has written a manual on the rules for seizing evidence stored in computers. "Searching and Seizing Computers and Obtaining Electronic Evidence in Criminal Investigations"
Carnivore
Carnivore is a computer program designed by the FBI to intercept Internet communications.

CDT's Carnivore Reference Page


CALEA
The Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act of 1994 (CALEA) was supposed to preserve law enforcement surveillance capabilities in the face of technological chage, but the FBI has been trying to use it to claim control over the design of the telephone network to enhance its surveillance powers.

CDT's CALEA Reference Page


Roving Wiretaps
A roving wiretap order allows the government to tap any phone lines that a suspect may use.

-Congress Passes "Roving Wiretaps," Expands Surveillance Authority
-E-RIGHTS Bill (S. 854) tightens standard for roving taps


Echelon
Echelon is a secretive international surveillance system that operates outside of the normal limitations of the Constitution.

International Monitoring by US government


FIDNet
FIDNet is a comprehensive monitoring system intended to protect government computers, but it raises serious privacy concerns.

CDT's FIDNet Reference Page


CESA
CESA was a bill proposed by the Clinton Administration that would allow the government to seize decryption keys without notice to the user.

CDT's CESA Reference Page


Articles

   
2004 United States v. Councilman email privacy case
 

A 2004 court decision has revealed a significant gap in email privacy protection. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit ruled in United States v. Councilman that an email provider does not violate federal wiretap laws when it opens emails to its customers and uses them for its own competitive business purposes. Although the decision applies only in a few New England states, its interpretation of Internet privacy laws if more broadly accepted would weaken protections for real-time communications over the Internet.

After CDT and other public interest organizations joined the Justice Department in urging the court to rehear the case, the Court of Appeals announced it will rehear the case en banc.

Litigation Documents:

Legislative Efforts to Overturn Councilman:



Free Speech | Data Privacy | Government Surveillance | Cryptography | Domain Names | International | Bandwidth | Security | Internet Standards, Technology and Policy Project | Terrorism | Authentication | Right to Know | Spam
Navigation bar
Our Mission / Get Involved / Staff / Publications / Links / Search CDT / Jobs / Action!
Previous Headlines | Legislative Tracking | CDT's Privacy Policy
  The Center For Democracy & Technology
1634 Eye Street NW, Suite 1100
Washington, DC 20006
(v) 202.637.9800
(f) 202.637.0968
Contact CDT

Copyright © 2005 by Center for Democracy and Technology.
The content throughout this Web site that originates with CDT can be freely copied and used as long as you make no substantive changes and clearly give us credit. Details.

CDT Mission Get Involved Staff Policy Posts Resource Library Search the Site Jobs Take Action