Back to www.cdt.org                    
  IMAGE MAP
Security and Privacy
Join CDT's Action Network!

Join With CDT in Making an Impact on Internet Policy!



Wiretap Overview

Overview Government Surveillance of Telephones and the Internet


Search & Seizure
The Dept. of Justice has written a manual on the rules for seizing evidence stored in computers. "Searching and Seizing Computers and Obtaining Electronic Evidence in Criminal Investigations"
Carnivore
Carnivore is a computer program designed by the FBI to intercept Internet communications.

CDT's Carnivore Reference Page


CALEA
The Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act of 1994 (CALEA) was supposed to preserve law enforcement surveillance capabilities in the face of technological chage, but the FBI has been trying to use it to claim control over the design of the telephone network to enhance its surveillance powers.

CDT's CALEA Reference Page


Roving Wiretaps
A roving wiretap order allows the government to tap any phone lines that a suspect may use.

-Congress Passes "Roving Wiretaps," Expands Surveillance Authority
-E-RIGHTS Bill (S. 854) tightens standard for roving taps


Echelon
Echelon is a secretive international surveillance system that operates outside of the normal limitations of the Constitution.

International Monitoring by US government


FIDNet
FIDNet is a comprehensive monitoring system intended to protect government computers, but it raises serious privacy concerns.

CDT's FIDNet Reference Page


CESA
CESA was a bill proposed by the Clinton Administration that would allow the government to seize decryption keys without notice to the user.

CDT's CESA Reference Page


Articles

   
Response to Sept. 11, 2001 Terrorist Attacks
 

Secret Detentions During September 11 Investigation

Memorandum to Interested Persons

RE: Secret Detentions During September 11 Investigation
From: The Center for National Security Studies
Date: November 20, 2001

  1. Status of FOIA request for information on 1,100 plus detainees.
    • On October 29, twenty organizations filed a FOIA request with the Justice Department, the FBI and the INS to challenge the unprecedented level of secrecy surrounding detention of 1,100 plus individuals during the investigation of the September 11 attacks.
    • The Department of Justice has agreed to expedite our FOIA request; the FBI denied the request, claiming release of the requested information would harm an ongoing criminal investigation; and the INS has only confirmed receipt of the request.
  2. Secrecy about the detentions increases.
    • On November 8, after conflicting statements from the White House and the DOJ about the status of the detainees, the DOJ announced they would no longer release the number of detentions. Now, no one can monitor even the scope of the investigation.
  3. Denial of FOIA based on harm to ongoing investigations does not match amount of information government has already released.
    • The claim that releasing any of the names and basis for detention would do harm to ongoing investigations is difficult to accept when the Attorney General himself has released information about individuals who have been detained and the government believes are connected with terrorist organizations.
    • For example, the Attorney General claimed that three men arrested in Detroit had advanced knowledge of the attacks; in Texas, two men were removed from a train after they were discovered carrying box cutters and a large sum of money; and a man was arrested in Minnesota after he sought lessons only to steer a jumbo jet.
    • Based on press reports, government officials have stated that they believe only a fraction of those who have been detained are connected with the terrorist attacks. Therefore, it is inconceivable that releasing information on the numerous other detainees would harm the investigation of the September 11 attacks.
  4. Cognitive rights of detainees that have been violated.
    • The government has denied bail for minor immigration or criminal violations that would not otherwise result in incarceration.
    • Lack of information about arrests has interfered with the right to effective counsel and contact with family members.
    • Press reports have cited cases where detainees have been abused by inmates or mistreated by prison officials.
    • The government has abused the material witness statute, detaining 'witnesses' where the government's goal is not to ensure their testimony at trial, but preventive detention.
  5. Potential harm to American citizens arrested abroad.
    • When the government detains a foreign national, they are obligated by international treaty to notify the government of his or her home country.
    • When American citizens are detained overseas, our government protests loudly when they are not informed.
    • Failure to live up to this obligation, even in this extraordinary case, could do harm to Americans arrested abroad.



Free Speech | Data Privacy | Government Surveillance | Cryptography | Domain Names | International | Bandwidth | Security | Internet Standards, Technology and Policy Project | Terrorism | Authentication | Right to Know | Spam
Navigation bar
Our Mission / Get Involved / Staff / Publications / Links / Search CDT / Jobs / Action!
Previous Headlines | Legislative Tracking | CDT's Privacy Policy
  The Center For Democracy & Technology
1634 Eye Street NW, Suite 1100
Washington, DC 20006
(v) 202.637.9800
(f) 202.637.0968
Contact CDT

Copyright © 2005 by Center for Democracy and Technology.
The content throughout this Web site that originates with CDT can be freely copied and used as long as you make no substantive changes and clearly give us credit. Details.

CDT Mission Get Involved Staff Policy Posts Resource Library Search the Site Jobs Take Action